🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as one of the most fatal – and significant – occasions in multiple decades of unrest in this area.

In the streets where it happened – the memories of Bloody Sunday are painted on the walls and etched in collective memory.

A civil rights march was conducted on a chilly yet clear day in Londonderry.

The demonstration was challenging the system of detention without trial – imprisoning people without due process – which had been established following three years of violence.

Troops from the Parachute Regiment fatally wounded 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and continues to be, a overwhelmingly nationalist population.

A specific visual became particularly memorable.

Pictures showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, using a blood-stained cloth in his effort to defend a assembly moving a youth, Jackie Duddy, who had been fatally wounded.

News camera operators recorded considerable film on the day.

Historical records includes Father Daly informing a reporter that military personnel "just seemed to fire in all directions" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

The narrative of the incident was rejected by the initial investigation.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the military had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the peace process, the administration established a fresh examination, in response to advocacy by surviving kin, who said the first investigation had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the conclusion by Lord Saville said that generally, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that none of the victims had posed any threat.

At that time head of state, David Cameron, apologised in the House of Commons – saying deaths were "without justification and unacceptable."

The police started to look into the matter.

A military veteran, referred to as the defendant, was brought to trial for murder.

Accusations were made concerning the deaths of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old William McKinney.

The accused was also accused of attempting to murder multiple individuals, other civilians, further individuals, Michael Quinn, and an unknown person.

There is a court ruling protecting the veteran's identity protection, which his legal team have argued is necessary because he is at threat.

He stated to the examination that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at persons who were armed.

That claim was rejected in the official findings.

Material from the examination could not be used directly as proof in the court case.

In court, the accused was screened from view behind a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in the proceedings at a session in December 2024, to reply "not responsible" when the allegations were put to him.

Kin of the victims on that day travelled from the city to the judicial building every day of the proceedings.

One relative, whose relative was killed, said they were aware that listening to the case would be painful.

"I visualize everything in my memory," he said, as we examined the primary sites referenced in the proceedings – from Rossville Street, where the victim was shot dead, to the nearby the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were killed.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and place him in the medical transport.

"I went through the entire event during the evidence.

"But even with experiencing all that – it's still meaningful for me."